2) The Chronicle of Ethiopia There once was an Ethiopian princess named Gudit (or Yodit, or Esato, or Ga’wa), who had a totally legit princess lineage.But she burnt down a church, overturned funeral markers, and plugged up water sources, turning parts of Ethiopia into a desert – because reasons. But in Judith the names of persons and localities are introduced in such profusion and with such minuteness of detail as have no parallel in the other old Jewish compositions of this class. It must therefore be concluded either that the principal names of the story are a mere disguise, or that they were chosen with a purely literary purpose, and with the intent to disclaim at the outset any historical verity for the tale. This feature it has in common with such stories as those of Ruth, Esther, Daniel, and especially with the Book of Tobit, the work most nearly akin to it.No account is taken of the fact that an average of 100 miles a day is in any case excessive for an army consisting of infanty as well as cavalry.As we have seen, the identity of Bethulia is also unknown." (Introduction to the Old Testament, pp.
This story zigged and zagged in unexpected directions on me during the research — so let’s go tumble down a rabbit hole together, shall we? Down a Rabbit Hole So – like me, perhaps you were unaware that there is a long (very long! If you’re up on your Old Testament, you may recall a cameo by a certain Queen of Sheba (Miss Sheba if you’re nasty), where she showed up to King Solomon’s court, was like, “I guess this is pretty alright or whatever,” and then took off. Alberto Soggin writes: "The most obvious inaccuracies and inconstistencies in the historical sphere seem to be as follows (we indicate them following the basic study made by A.-M. First of all, there is the question of Nebuchadnezzar of Assyria and Arphaxad of Media in 1.1, then the presentation of the Babylonian exile as a past event in 4.3 and 5.19; the claims to divine honours made by these monarchs in 3.8 and 6.2 bring down the date of the work quite considerably, so that it cannot be before the time of the Diadochi (end of the fourth century).One explanation has been sought in a little-konwn episode of Persian history: towards 521, during the disorders which followed the death of Cambyses, a certain Arakha seized the throne of Babylon and on occupying it took the name of Nebuchadnezzar; for a short time he sought to reconquer the territories which belonged to the Babylonian empire, but was then swept away, along with many others, by Darius I Hystaspes. Grintz has pointed out the parallels between the theme of the book and an episode which took place during the siege of Lindus, on the island of Rhodes, but here again the comparison is extremely weak.It is beyond all question that the narrator in describing Bethulia is describing a real place with which he is personally familiar. This Geba is the of the Talmud, the modern Jeba', two or three hours northeast of Samaria, at the point where the ascent into the mountainous country begins. As Torrey first pointed out, in the "Journal of the American Oriental Society," xx. At the head of this ascent, a short distance back from the brow of the bill, stood the city (xiv. Rising above it and overlooking it were mountains (vii. 12 et seq.) is the great spring Ras el-'Ain, in the valley (ἐν τῷ αὐλῶνι, ib.The plain requirements of the description are these: a large city in the hill-country of Samaria, on the direct road from Jezreel to Jerusalem, lying in the path of the enemy, at the head of an important pass, a few hours (vi. Between this point and the plain of Jezreel there is nothing resembling a pass. The statement that his vast army "encamped between Geba and Seythopolis" (iii. 160-172, there is one city, and only one, which perfectly satisfies all the above-mentioned requirements, namely, Shechem. 7) is the modern Bait al-Ma, fifteen minutes from Shechem. 17) just above Shechem, "at the foot" of Mount Gerizim. Further corroborative evidence is given by the account of the blockade of Bethulia in vii. "Ekrebel" is 'Aḳrabah, three hours southeast of Shechem, on the road to the Jordan; "Chusi" is Ḳuza (so G. Smith and others), two hours south, on the road to Jerusalem. The poem in the closing chapter is a fine composition, plainly the work of no ordinary writer.
Search for gudith dating:
Similarly, such names as the commander Holofernes and the high priest Joakim are as impossible to harmonize chronologically as Holophernes' incredible march of three hundred miles in three days is to take seriously." (Introduction to the Old Testament, p. de Silva writes: "A postexilic date is necessitated by Achior's discourse (-19; cf. The names Holofernes and Bagoas, moreover, are otherwise attested only in the Persian period, as are the loan words 'satrap' (5:2), 'turban' (), and 'sword' (akinakes, 13:6), as well as the practice of 'preparing earth and water' (2:7).